PVR in works for Sky?

Printable View

30-08-2004, 09:32 AM
zollymonsta

PVR in works for Sky?

http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,...6a1864,00.html

Rupert Murdoch own INL which is merging with Sky TV.

Apparently the newspaper article specifically mentioned a set top box with PVR built in.
30-08-2004, 07:50 PM
timmy

Quote:

However, Rupert Murdoch argues: "I haven't heard anyone who has their own recorder who doesn't rave about them, and, what's more, surveys have shown those who have one watch 10 per cent more television."

yeah.. dang he is half right there :p
19-09-2004, 08:24 AM
number6

Quote:

Originally Posted by zollymonsta

http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,...6a1864,00.html

Rupert Murdoch own INL which is merging with Sky TV.

Apparently the newspaper article specifically mentioned a set top box with PVR built in.

Yes, Russell Brown confirmed this on Mediawatch today.

Apparently its coming "soon" (next 12 months), will be based on the Sky+ service/product offered in the UK, which unfortunately, is nothing much at all to write home about, if the crappy ads I saw for it in the UK earlier this year and the comparisons that Tivo users in the UK make about it compared to a UK Tivo.

Seems like the dear old Sky subscriber will have to pay for the feature - probably by shelling out another $20 a month forever to Sky for a mediocre product, that uses the EPG thats already coming "for free". Man that sucks.
19-09-2004, 08:28 AM
number6

Quote:

Originally Posted by Murdoch

I haven't heard anyone who has their own recorder who doesn't rave about them, and, what's more, surveys have shown those who have one watch 10 per cent more television.

Yes, and they also watch about 100% less ads and 100% less of Station "self" promotions.

And all on a supposedly "pay" TV service, where ads (promos included) are supposed to be much less frequent than "regular" TV.

Yeah, Right.
02-10-2004, 11:20 AM
number6

Quote:

Originally Posted by number6

Yes, Russell Brown confirmed this on Mediawatch today.

Apparently its coming "soon" (next 12 months), will be based on the Sky+ service/product offered in the UK, which unfortunately, is nothing much at all to write home about, if the crappy ads I saw for it in the UK earlier this year and the comparisons that Tivo users in the UK make about it compared to a UK Tivo.

Seems like the dear old Sky subscriber will have to pay for the feature - probably by shelling out another $20 a month forever to Sky for a mediocre product, that uses the EPG thats already coming "for free". Man that sucks.

A follow up on this:

Saturdays NZ Herald has a story about this being offered by Sky "late next year".

To quote the relevant parts of the story:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nz_Herald

SKY TV will release a digital video recorder next year that will see the standard Sky decoder transformed into a device capable of storing hours of programming.

The personal video recorder (PVR) will work with Sky's electronic programming guide, allowing recordings to be pre-set with the Sky remote control unit.

...

Sky will ride on the coat-tails of Australian pay TV operator Foxtel to release a similar type of PVR here.

Sky chief executive John Fellet said the device would add $200 to $250 to the cost of a typical Sky installation.

Sky says it will release its electronic programming guide to third-party PVR vendors "eventually".

TV viewers can already buy hard disk drive-based recorders for about $500, but their usefulness is limited without an integrated programming guide.

Sky would likely place an order for 25,000 PVRs towards the end of next year.

Seems like Sky is trying to hold back the tide of PVRs by promising a solution "sometime soon".

Given the lead times of 25,000 PVRs early 2006 for "in your hands" for a Sky PVR modelled on the Foxtel unit sounds a bit like paying lip-service to the whole idea - especially when Sky previously announced similar intentions about 3 years ago.

The same goes their comments re: "releasing EPG data to third party-PVR makers (read Microsoft and others) 'eventually'".
02-10-2004, 06:00 PM
STu

I'm also curious tha there is only an additional installation cost mentioned. I would have thought there would have been an additional subscription fee. Maybe there will just be additional plan charges to support things like simultaineous multiple channels if the proposed STB has multiple tuners.

Ain't speculation wonderous thing.
I'm happy with my TiVo for the mo.
03-10-2004, 08:24 PM
deanm

Nice comparison of Sky+ vs. TiVo here and here.
04-10-2004, 08:47 AM
brucer

Thanks for posting those links! Couple of things caught my eye in particular, one was the rather ominous fact that Sky have the ability to disable fast-forwarding thru ads with the Sky+ pvr and the other was the issue with pay-per-view programs, you can only access the recording for 24 hours after paying for it and some events you can't record at all.. I wonder how many other DRM-type features will find their way into the boxes by the time they are actually available here? I suspect you'll always be better off with a 3rd-party PVR than one supplied by the broadcaster with a vested interest in controlling your viewing habits/options.
02-11-2004, 12:33 PM
badcat

sky PVR

latest tone magazine has a article and apic of the new HD PVR decoder...
ken
02-11-2004, 01:54 PM
STu

Reading the article, it makes one wonder about any additional costs over and above the additional "couple of hundred" installation mentioned.

eg. It's a dual channel receiver so are Sky going to let us receive and decode two channels at the same time for the same subscription fee where they currently charge addtional subscriptions for a second decoder in the house.

Still, dual tuner will be nice.
06-11-2004, 10:26 PM
Lurker

I have no axe to grind tivo vs Sky+......

Differences appeared to be

Tivo record 1 Sky channel, Sky+ record 1 watch another (1 for Sky+)

Sky+ straight digital to digital Tivo is Digital to Anaolg to Digital (plus Analog to Digital again if want to archive to DVD Recorder) (2 for Sky+)

If no sub for Tivo = slightly hoopy VCR, No sub for Sky+ = standard single channel decoder with no recording (1 for Tivo)

Do not know about DRM restrictions

Sky when I left the Uk in Decemebr was offering free sub if took movie or sports channels.

Sky+ hacking upgrades poor (1 for Tivo)

So Sky+ good if you had anything other than the basic Sky package and let us not forget with the raft of channels available in the UK there was often cursing time when you might want to record one Sky channel and record another....

I think here there might be an issue for Sky as the stand alone HDD/DVD combos are getting better. Panasonic has released in the UK a 400GB :eek: HDD DVD combo which will get here (eventually :D ) and if it has Gemstar (or some other) guide data (do you have to pay for that here or does it comes free with the HDD/DVD boxes :confused: ) Sky may have to consider a cheap low sub box to get market share.

Lets face it if a HDD/DVD box could have free guide data for a month in advance, record to hard disk, edit the content to trim adverts, archive to DVD with menus and chapters all without any digital/analog/digital conversion and all for under $800 I would be tempted to ditch my UK Tivo :o with all the attendant time spend farking around under the bonnet to get it to work with FTA etc.. so bring it on panasonic etc and let us see some real competition!!!!

In reality the biggest piss off is NZ TV stations cannot seem to start and stop programs within the hour or even within 10 minutes of their scheduled times... bring back decent TV controllers and slap channels for not running to time - come back Mussolini all is forgiven!